Monday, March 2, 2009

EAST COAST SAUNAS - FOR YOU

sauna Pictures, Images and Photos

EAST COAST SAUNAS - GET INSIDE EM AND LOVE THE FEELING , THE SCINTILLATING FEELING WHILE INSIDE IT , AND WAKE UP FEELING GREAT AND SUPERB ABOUT YOURSELF ! DO IT AFTER WORK , AFTER CLASS , AND GET MORE EFFICIENT IN LIFE .

SOME OF THE GREAT FEATURES INCLUDE -

Oxygen Ionizer: Releases ions to purify the air.
infra red sauna

All Glass Doors: Your beautiful infrared sauna is wrapped with gorgeous glass doors providing you with a chic look and a non-claustrophobic feeling.

to find out more check out - http://www.eastcoastsaunas.com/

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

THE SLUMDOG BECOMES SOME MILLIONAIRE !

Now there's this movie SLUM DOG MILLIONAIRE , it gets nation Wide AND international status , recognition , Oscars , all the glitterati and gold , . it tries to portray India in what was portrayed of India 10 years ago , without any attention to the fact that in these 10 years india has evolved into one of the finest nations of the world .
but ivegotta admit i liked that scene in which this shit caked boy comes to take the autograph of an Indian celeb in a weird sort of way , the same way i would like any scene that shows the poverty stricken life of any youthfully ambitious slum boy from any other country , i mean every country must have slum dwellers right ?
but on a more serious note i completely agree with what the above mentioned celebrity MR. AMITABH BACHCHAN himself said on his blog that every nation would have this poor side to it , as was quoted " murky underbelly" ,.
the only thing that originally scores is that A.R RAHMAN has had a superb , instinctive , natural sense of adding the musical scores to this film

Slumdog Millionaire Pictures, Images and Photos

Sunday, January 25, 2009

The Shadowy Details of Today's Solar Eclipse

By Joe Rao
SPACE.com Night Sky Columnist


It's not likely that many people will see the total phase of Friday's solar eclipse. Totality will be visible only from the middle of the South Pacific Ocean and only for, at the very most, 42 seconds.

Only from an aircraft or the deck of a ship positioned precisely within the very narrow (17-mile-wide) path of totality would observers get a brief glimpse of a completely obscured Sun, one of nature's great spectacles.

It is a popular misconception that the phenomenon of a total eclipse of the Sun is a rare occurrence. Quite the contrary, about once every 18 months, on average, a total solar eclipse is visible from some place on the Earth's surface. That's two totalities for every three years.

However, seeing a total eclipse of the Sun from a specific location is another story altogether.

Shadowy details

On the average, the length of the Moon's shadow at New Moon is 232,100 miles (373,530 kilometers), and the distance to the nearest point of the Earth's surface 234,900 miles (378,030 kilometers).

This means that when the Moon passes directly in front of the Sun, its shadow will usually miss the Earth by some 2,800 miles (4,500 kilometers) and the eclipse will merely be annular, with a dazzling ring of sunlight still visible around the Moon's silhouette.

Of course we all know that total eclipses do occur, because the New Moon's distance can vary between 217,730 miles (350,400 kilometers) and 247,930 miles (399,000 kilometers) from the Earth's surface, on account of the Moon's elliptical orbit.

As it turns out, the April 8 eclipse is one of those unusual hybrids where the eclipse is total over only a part of its path and annular throughout the rest. Near and at the ends of the path, the distance to the Moon is too great (owing to the curvature of the Earth) for its dark cone of shadow (called the umbra) to touch the Earth's surface. It's only near the middle of the eclipse track that the tip of the umbra barely scrapes the Earth, changing the character of the eclipse from annular into a total. Then, as the track approaches the Central American coast, the umbra moves off the Earth's surface and the eclipse switches back to annular.

Of all solar eclipses, about 35 percent are partial; 32 percent annular; 28 percent total; but only 5 percent are hybrids.

So now, let's return to our original question: How often a total eclipse can be seen from a specific point on the Earth's surface?

The science of prediction

Predicting the details of a solar eclipse requires not only a fairly good idea of the motions of the Sun and Moon, but also an accurate distance to the Moon and accurate geographical coordinates. Rough determinations of eclipse circumstances became possible after the work of Claudius Ptolemy (around 150 A.D.), and diagrams of the eclipsed Sun have been found in medieval manuscripts and in the first books printed about astronomy.

Since the distance to the Moon varies, the width of the path of totality differs from one eclipse to another. This width will change even during a single eclipse, because different parts of the Earth lie at different distances from the Moon and also because of geometrical effects as the shadow falls at an oblique angle onto the Earth's surface.

In calculating a solar eclipse, one of the first steps is to determine the shadow's relation to the "fundamental plane," which passes through the Earth's center and is perpendicular to the Moon-Sun line. The path of the axis of the shadow across this plane is virtually a straight line. It is from this special geometry, that the intersection of the Moon's dark shadow cone with the rotating spheroid of our Earth must be worked out, using lengthy procedures in trigonometry. To say the least, these factors can make the calculations quite involved (although today's high-speed PCs can effortlessly crunch the numbers, making the task much easier).

In their classical textbook "Astronomy" (Boston, 1926), authors H.N. Russell, R.S. Dugan and J.Q. Stewart noted that:

"Since the track of a solar eclipse is a very narrow path over the earth's surface, averaging only 60 or 70 miles in width, we find that in the long run a total eclipse happens at any given station only once in about 360 years."
Eclipse Terms

Partial eclipse: The Moon covers only part of the Sun.

Total eclipse: The Moon covers the entire disk of the Sun along a narrow path across the Earth.

Annular eclipse: The Moon is too far from Earth to completely cover the Sun. A thin ring of the Sun's disk surrounds the Moon.

More recently, Jean Meeus of Belgium, whose special interest is spherical and mathematical astronomy, recalculated this figure statistically on an HP-85 microcomputer and found that the mean frequency for a total eclipse of the Sun for any given point on the Earth's surface is once in 375 years. A value that is very close to the figure that Russell, Dugan and Stewart arrived at.

Double check

Without retracing these computations, there is perhaps another way to check the validity of these answers. In the table below, is a listing of 25 cities. Twenty-three are in North America, plus two others: Honolulu, on the Hawaiian Island of Oahu, and Hamilton, the Capital of Bermuda. Using two computer programs designed to scan through the centuries for eclipses, I first searched for the date of the most recent total solar eclipse that was visible from each city, then searched for the date when the next total eclipse for that city would take place.

But it should first be stressed that the nearly four-century wait is merely a statistical average. Indeed, over a much shorter span of time, the paths of different eclipses can sometimes criss-cross over a specific place, so in some cases the wait might not be so long at all. In fact, a forty-mile stretch of the Atlantic coast of Angola, just north of Lobito, experienced a total solar eclipse on June 21, 2001 and was treated to another on Dec. 4, 2002, after less than 18 months!

On the other hand, as Mr. Meeus recently discovered, some spots on the Earth's surface may not see a total solar eclipse for 36 centuries (" . . . though this must be exceedingly rare," he notes).

On our listing of 25 selected cities, how close would we come to the computed mean-frequency of nearly 400-years between total eclipses?

Here is the list:

Location


Most recent totality


Next scheduled totality


Years between eclipses

Anchorage, AK


1943, February 4


2399, August 2*


456.5

Atlanta, GA


1778, June 24


2078, May 11


299.9

Boston, MA


1959, October 2


2079, May 1


119.6

Calgary, Alberta


1869, August 7


2044, August 23


175.0

Chicago, IL


1806, June 6*


2205, July 17


399.1

Dallas, TX


1623, October 23


2024, April 8


401.5

Denver, CO


1878, July 29


2045, August 12


167.0

Halifax, Nova Scotia


1970, March 7


2079, May 1


109.1

Hamilton, Bermuda


1532, August 30**


2352, February 16


819.5

Honolulu, HI


1850, August 7


2252, December 31


402.4

Houston, TX


1259, October 17**


2200, April 14


940.5

Las Vegas, NV


1724, May 22


2207, November 20


483.5

Los Angeles, CA


1724, May 22


3290, April 1


1,565.9

Mexico City, Mexico


1991, July 11


2261, December 22


270.4

Miami, FL


1752, May 13*


2352, February 16


599.8

Montreal, Quebec


1932, August 31*


2024, April 8*


91.6

New Orleans, LA


1900, May 28


2078, May 11


178.0

New York, NY


1925, January 24*


2079, May 1


154.3

Phoenix, AZ


1806, June 16


2205, July 17


399.1

St. Louis, MO


1442, July 7**


2017, August 21


575.1

San Francisco, CA


1424, June 26**


2252, December 31


828.5

Seattle, WA


1860, July 18


2645, May 17


784.8

Toronto, Ontario


1142, August 22**


2144, October 26


1,002.2

Washington, DC


1451, June 28**


2200, April 14


748.8

Winnipeg, Manitoba


1979, February 26


3356, September 16


1,377.6

A single asterisk (*) denotes that either the northern or southern limit of the Moon's umbral shadow only grazes a specific city; only part of that metropolitan area will see a total eclipse while the other part sees a partial eclipse. A double asterisk (**) indicates a date when the now-defunct Julian Calendar was in effect.

The average number of years between eclipses turned out to be nearly 534 years. Considering our relatively small survey of 25 cities, this is reasonably close to the once-in-almost four-century rule.

A botched opportunity

All of us who enjoy eclipses should be indebted to those astronomers who pioneered doing these extensive calculations; otherwise we would not know exactly where to position ourselves for the big event. Prussian astronomer Friedrich Bessel introduced a group of mathematical formulas in 1824 (now called "Besselian Elements") that greatly simplified the calculation of the position of the Sun, Moon and Earth.

It is too bad that Bessel's procedures were not available in the late 18th century, when Samuel Williams, a professor at Harvard, led an expedition to Penobscot Bay, Maine to observe the total solar eclipse of Oct. 27, 1780. As it turned out, this eclipse took place during the Revolutionary War and Penobscot Bay lay behind enemy lines. Fortunately, the British granted the expedition safe passage, citing the interest of science above political differences.

And yet in the end, it was all for naught.

Williams apparently made a fatal error in his computations and inadvertently positioned his men at Islesboro - outside the path of totality - likely finding this out with a heavy heart when the waning crescent of sunlight slid completely around the dark edge of the Moon and started thickening!

source :http://www.space.com/

Saturday, January 3, 2009

Vickie guerrero nude pics !!

hey look everyone - pics , of that lady from wwe show smackdown , dont watch if u r a eating dinner , but its not bad !!! i mean at least not bad for one look at least , !!
now if u go in to waste ur time for some real nude pics , DONT - bcuz the pics r hosted by wwe.com itself and are TOTALLY CENSORED , ( so loose all hope guys !!). it was just a stunt pulled by hhh or rather wwe so that we kids google wwe more , ( dint they now recently announce that wwe was the most googled topic ?? ).
this is da link - http://www.wwe.com/shows/smackdown/sdspecial/vickienude/

Tuesday, December 23, 2008

Are Muscular Men More Attractive?

Muscles. Hot or not?

UCLA professor David Frederick and colleagues have asked: Why is Muscularity Sexy? Conclusion:

[...] these studies suggest that men’s physical features are related not only to women’s expressed preferences for mates but also to men’s and women’s past mate choices and sex behaviors.

NOTE: Despite the many media reports - we need to understand that the subjects of the study were male and female undergraduates (aged 18-25) living in California, USA. Extrapolating that to all men and women everywhere is foolish.

One of the studies interviewed 99 male undergraduates about their sexual histories, and, to be honest - can you really believe they didn't "talk up" their exploits?

This fascinating paper actually includes 6 studies and is difficult to summarize. Here I will focus on just one of the studies:

1. 141 college women aged around 20 looked at 6 computer generated images of men (created with MyVirtualModel.com).
2. Note that only the images were shown to the women - not the labels (e.g. brawny, slender, etc).
3. The women rated the images against four factors: sexual desirability, commitment, physical dominance (over other males), and volatility (e.g. bad temper).

Okay, deep-breath guys...

* Attractiveness, sexual desirability? The built and toned guys came tops. The chubby guy was bottom of the heap. Brawny guy still desirable but not as much as built and toned guy.

* Physical Dominance? Brawny and built were tops, the slender guy bottom.

* Commitment? Chubby guy voted the best, brawny and built the worst.

* Volatility? Slender guy the least volatile, with brawny and built the most volatile.

http://www.diet-blog.com/archives/muscle.jpg

Pressure To Be More Muscular May Lead Men To Unhealthy Behaviors

ScienceDaily (Aug. 10, 2006) — Women are not the only ones in American society who feel pressure to achieve the perfect body.

New research suggests that men feel pressure to have muscular bodies, and that influence can lead some to symptoms of eating disorders, pressure to use steroids, and an unhealthy preoccupation with weightlifting.

“Men see these idealized, muscular men in the media and feel their own bodies don't measure up,” said Tracy Tylka, author of the study and assistant professor of psychology at Ohio State University 's Marion campus.

“For some men, this can lead to unhealthy and potentially dangerous behaviors to try to reach that ideal.”

Tylka presented her research at a symposium August 10 in New Orleans at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.

Of course, women have been pressured for decades to achieve a thin ideal, but this is a more recent phenomenon for men, Tylka said.

“Instead of seeing a decrease in objectification of women in society, there has just been an increase in the objectification of men. And you can see that in the media today,” she said.

To test how this emphasis on muscularity has affected men, Tylka studied 285 college men. She asked them a variety of questions to determine how much pressure to be muscular that they felt from family, friends, romantic partners and the media.

The findings showed that the more pressure the men felt, the more they felt they had to live up to the ideals.

“They start to believe that the only attractive male body is a muscular one. And when they internalize that belief, they judge themselves on that ideal and probably come up short, because it is not a realistic portrayal of men,” she said.

While other studies have suggested men can become preoccupied with their muscles, Tylka said this research shows men are also very worried about their body fat.

“Not only are men being targeted to be muscular, but they also feel they have to be very lean to show off their muscularity.”

And the more dissatisfied that men in the study felt with their muscularity and body fat, the more they engaged in unhealthy behaviors, findings showed.

For example, men who were not happy with their muscles were more likely to say that their weight-training schedule interfered with other parts of their life, that others think they work out too much, that they used protein supplements, and even that they thought about using steroids.

Men who were dissatisfied with their body fat were more likely to report symptoms of eating disorders, such as avoiding certain foods, being terrified about being overweight, and being preoccupied with a desire to be thinner.

Tylka said there is a difference between men who exercise and watch their diet for their health, and those who do so because they feel pressure to change their bodies.

“It is good to exercise, to lift weights, and to eat the foods that make your body function well,” she said.

“But it is not good to be preoccupied with gaining muscle mass. Those that are preoccupied are not working out to get healthier, they are working out to bulk up. They are not eating healthy, they are cutting out major food groups like carbohydrates and eating massive amounts of protein.”

While men in American society are feeling increasing pressures to achieve the perfect body, Tylka said women still get a disproportionate share of the pressure.

“Women still get objectified more than men, but men are feeling the pressure too.”
Adapted from materials provided by Ohio State University.

(source - http://www.sciencedaily.com/ )

Saturday, December 20, 2008